高级检索

    光-煤-储互补系统宽负荷分层抽汽策略及性能研究

    Hierarchical Steam Extraction Strategy and Performance of a Solar-Coal-Storage Complementary System Under Wide Load Conditions

    • 摘要: 针对光-煤互补系统在低负荷、高辐照条件下的太阳热冗余问题,构建槽式集热场、600 MW超临界燃煤机组与熔盐储热耦合的光-煤-储互补系统。依据抽汽能级与负荷-辐照匹配关系,提出高压侧优先和低压侧优先两种分层抽汽策略,并基于非设计工况逐时准稳态模型评价其热力、环境与经济性能。结果表明:在相同负荷、季节和时刻下,按四季典型日加权后,100%、75%和50% THA下策略一的年化太阳能净发电量分别为94.84、84.26和73.89 GWh,较策略二提高4.3%、22.1%和37.1%。50% THA下,策略一等效年节煤量和CO2减排潜力分别为2.82万t和5.94万t,LCOE为0.551元/(kW·h),静态投资回收期为18.3 a。计及换热温差和相对面积需求,策略二在满负荷下的LCOE和回收期略低,策略一在75%和50% THA下的LCOE、回收期和年净收益均占优。在本文机组、集热场、TES容量和逐时准稳态边界内,策略适用性取决于负荷,高压侧优先策略更适于中低负荷运行。

       

      Abstract: To address surplus solar heat in solar-coal complementary systems under low-load and high-irradiance conditions, a solar-coal-storage complementary system integrating a parabolic-trough solar field, a 600 MW supercritical coal-fired unit, and molten-salt thermal energy storage was established. Two hierarchical extraction strategies, prioritizing the high- and low-pressure sides, were proposed according to extraction-steam energy grade and load-irradiance matching. Their thermodynamic, environmental, and economic performances were evaluated using an off-design hourly quasi-steady model. Based on weighted representative days for four seasons and paired results at the same load, season, and hour, the annualized net solar electricity generation of Strategy 1 at 100%, 75%, and 50% THA was 94.84, 84.26, and 73.89 GWh, respectively, 4.3%, 22.1%, and 37.1% higher than that of Strategy 2. At 50% THA, Strategy 1 achieved an equivalent annual coal saving of 28.2 kt and an operational CO2-reduction potential of 59.4 kt, with an LCOE of 0.551 CNY/(kW·h) and a static payback period of 18.3 a. Accounting for heat-transfer temperature matching and relative area demand, Strategy 2 achieved slightly lower LCOE and a shorter payback period at full load, whereas Strategy 1 achieved lower LCOE, shorter payback periods, and higher annual net benefits at 75% and 50% THA. Within the specified unit, solar-field, TES-capacity, and hourly quasi-steady boundaries, strategy applicability is load dependent, and the high-pressure-side-priority strategy is more suitable for partial-load operation.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回